اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite

Advanced

Obama critiques Israeli settlement expansion
Published Wednesday 18/11/2009 (updated) 20/11/2009 00:44
Font- Font+
Obama confirs with Abbas [MaanImages – Archive]
Bethlehem – Ma’an/Agencies – US President Barack Obama criticized on Wednesday Israel’s plans to expand settlements on occupied Palestinian land in a rare personal pronouncement on the subject.

"I think that additional settlement building does not contribute to Israel's security, I think it makes it harder for them to make peace with their neighbors," Obama told Fox News, according to Reuters.

"I think it embitters the Palestinians in a way that could end up being very dangerous."

Israel has rejected US and international critique of its plans to build 900 new houses in the settlement of Gilo, on the outskirts of Jerusalem, abutting Bethlehem. Gilo was built on land belonging to the Bethlehem municipality and Palestinian families living in the Bethlehem area, but is considered part of Jerusalem under Israeli law.

900 reasons to lose hope

The Palestine Liberation Organization’s chief negotiator, Saeb Erekat also condemned the planned expansion, saying, “This provides 900 more reasons why hopes for salvaging the two-state solution and restarting genuine negotiations are rapidly fading, and why Israel is not a partner for peace.”

“Israel continues to undermine the very credibility to the Middle East peace process, making a mockery of existing agreements and sabotaging all prospects for a return to genuine negotiations,” Erekat added.

“This announcement is a direct slap in the face to the US and the Middle East Quartet. It is also a direct challenge to the international community, which has a duty to uphold international law. Failing to act only creates a culture of impunity when it comes to Israel’s daily violations of international law,” the official also said in a statement.

Jerusalem mayor hits back

Earlier, the Israeli mayor of Jerusalem, Nir Barkat said he "strongly objects" to America's hesitancy over the construction of settlements in the occupied half of the city.

Speaking Wednesday, Barkat said he "strongly objects to the American demand to halt construction in Jerusalem and will allow construction for Jews, Muslims, and Christians in any part of Jerusalem without prejudice," he said. In practice, however, Palestinian Christians and Muslims are not permitted to build homes or even expand existing structures legally.

Barakat, as well as his predecessors, has ignored the will of the international community around East Jerusalem, which Israeli forces occupied in 1967, "annexing" it inside Israel and declaring the city its "eternal, undivided capital." The international community has never recognized the annexation, rather recognizing the area as part of what will be a Palestinian state on the 1967 boundaries. Testifying to the position is the fact that the embassies of most nations to Israel, including America, are in Tel Aviv. Embassies in East Jerusalem serve the Palestinian population.

Suggesting that US policy toward Israel's refusal to stop expanding its borders was based on race or religion rather than legal rights to occupied territory, Barkat added, "Israeli law does not discriminate between Jews, Muslims, and Christians or between eastern and western Jerusalem. The demand to halt construction by religion is not legal in the United States or in any other free place in the world."

"I do not presume that any government would demand to freeze construction in the United States based on race, religion or gender and the attempt to demand it from Jerusalem is a double standard and inconceivable," he added.

The Prime Minister’s Bureau added fuel to the fire Wednesday evening, releasing a statement stating "construction in Gilo has been going on for decades" and noting there was "nothing new" in the recently released planning documents. "Gilo is a part of Jerusalem, just like Rehavia, Pisgat Zeev and Ramot Eshkol," the statement added, all the areas named are on land recognized by the international community as occupied Palestinian areas.

Demolitions

Meanwhile, Israeli bulldozers demolished a two-family home in the Palestinian town of Al-Isawiya, the second such demolition in two days. On Tuesday Israeli authorities razed a four-story building home to 30 people in a neighborhood south of the Old City.

The demolition is part of what Palestinians call an ongoing campaign of "Judaizing" Jerusalem, including the eviction of Palestinians from their homes, the destruction of Palestinian homes and the continued construction of settlements. They say Israel's decisions are not simply municipal matters, as East Jerusalem residents do not hold Israeli citizenship and permits to build there are all but impossible to obtain.

In his Monday report to the General Assembly, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon deplored Israel's decision to expand Gilo, stressing that it was built on Palestinian territory occupied by Israel in the 1967 war.

"The secretary-general reiterates his position that settlements are illegal, and calls on Israel to respect its commitments under the Road Map to cease all settlement activity, including natural growth," a statement issued by his spokesperson said.

"He believes that such actions undermine efforts for peace and cast doubt on the viability of the two-state solution," he added.

According to the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz, the Gilo plan involves the construction of 900 four- and five-bedroom housing units, "in an effort to lure relatively well-off residents." The plan, given the final okay by Israeli officials, was launched by the Israel Land Administration as part of Gilo's extension. According to the paper, another 4,000 units were proposed in and around the settlement.

The paper cited sources in the planning committee that said the eastward expansion of Jerusalem came following the scrapping of a plan by architect Moshe Safdie that would have seen West Jerusalem expand on top of natural and planted forests near Ramot. After criticism by environmental groups, it was scrapped, apparently in favor of a plan to build on Palestinian land instead.
Print Send to friend
1 ) Nour / Palestine
18/11/2009 09:08
From a strategic point of view, and given total Arab, European, and American in-action, for Palestinians to embrace the one state solution and recognize therein their best interests on the long run! One man, one vote. Achieve this, then expose Israel as an apartheid state demolishing Arab homes.

2 ) Nour / Palestine
18/11/2009 09:09
Already Abbas/PA have been sucked dry of all possible concessions and they want to squeeze more. Who's going to be the next lemon? Dahlan? Erekat? The pattern has become all too obvious, but the Palestinian people will not let them keep falling back on ridiculous grounds/positions. Stop it.

3 ) Mark of Lewiston / USA
18/11/2009 10:59
Next year Jericho will be on the list to be declared part of Jerusalem, just watch. I'm sure the Jerusalem mayor thinks it's a suburb already. He said Christians and Muslims can get building permits? Ha! Israeli law doesn't discriminate, but the Mayor does.

4 ) Nour / Palestine
18/11/2009 17:07
More blabla from the blabla smooth talker.

5 ) chil / usa
18/11/2009 18:32
if under occupation u must be as serious as ur occupier. the zionist are destroying homes everyday. the PA doesnt help the people resist this assault. they arrest the ones trying to resist the occupation. hamas is serious and even tho the west ignores them they are the big elephant in da room

6 ) Lisa / USA
18/11/2009 19:12
Not enough to just be critical. Obama needs to support Palestinians in their UN effort (read Financial Times "Brinkmanship ..." editorial today (Nov 18)) he needs to truly earn that Nobel Peace Prize that was gifted to him.

7 ) Lisa / USA
18/11/2009 19:16
Obama is satisfied just to be indignant and Sarkozy wants to hold another "Annapolis" type confernece. Pathetic! Forget the WEST ...go to where the real power is: BRIC and Turkey ...let them tell the West they see supporting you at UN is an imperative.

8 ) Julie / USA
18/11/2009 19:21
COME ON Obama! Where's his authority, power, leadership, manhood in the words: "I think.."? His words are weak, hestitant, uncertain like a meek child as if the gravity & intent of Israel's CRIMES could possibly be denied..which they CANT. He might as well add "I think...but that's just my opinion"

9 ) chil / usa
18/11/2009 20:41
lisa hate to drop this bomb on u but britain started this whole occupation and helps keep up the occupation to this day. the only real entity helping the pals. is iran. no other country is helping the way iran is. and i'm not a big fan of iran but the facts are clear.

10 ) Lisa / USA
18/11/2009 23:47
Chil,
BRIC: is short for: is Brazil, Russia, India and China...it's the power grouping that counts...

forget Group of 8

It's BRIC and Group of 20 era....



11 ) Ben Jabo / USA
19/11/2009 02:53
Don't you get it yet?
Obama doesn't give a hoot about the situation, he's only using it to distract attention from all the other irons he has in the fire
Unemployment, Health Plan, Stimulus plan, Iran, N. Korea

Obama always throws a new iron into the fire, helps to keep the heat off of him

12 ) Issa / USA
19/11/2009 06:11
Nour clames that she or he is from palestine but I do not think that she knows any thing about palestine. With every news Nour reads she responds by criticizing president Abbas or Dahlan or fatah leaders. To your knowledge Nour, if you are a palestinian then your enemy is Israel not your own people.

13 ) Issa / USA
19/11/2009 06:19
We lost palestine pecause of people like you Nour. You should write a book of how much you hate Abbas. But deos it matter to palestinians how much you hate Abbas. People knows the truth. I should tell that you should look for the truth but I know in advance that you cannot comprehend the truth.

14 ) Nour / Palestine
19/11/2009 09:56
Hello Issa, I pitty your attitude towards leaders. Leaders my friend are elected with a mandate to serve their own people and represent our interests. Fatah and the PLO camp have failed and screwed us royally. Especially their concessions so far. If you can't see this, you're blind.

15 ) Nour / Palestine
19/11/2009 10:05
#13 "We lost Palestine because of people like Nour" -> What a stupid comment, I love my country thank you very much. The difference between you and me is strategy. Yet you choose divisiveness and imagine me as a traitor/alien posing as Palestinian. That is rotten, rubbish attitude.

16 ) Light / Norway
21/11/2009 13:56
I support you Nour, I think you are very correct. The PA has had a major role in in breaking down the resistance to the occupation among their own people. They litterally drain their people of spirit and hope. And arrest people for critisizing it! Has Abbas simply been just a puppet for Israel?
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content.

Share/Bookmark

US envoy demands halt to settlement growth in E. Jerusalem
Man suffocates on poultry farm in Salfit
Fayyad: End army raids, settlement construction

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2010