اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Quartet talks peace with Israel, Palestinians
Published Thursday 10/03/2011 (updated) 12/03/2011 20:58
Font- Font+
The Middle East peace talks collapsed over an intractable dispute about
Jewish settlements [AFP/Menahem Kahana, File]


JERUSALEM (AFP) -- Envoys of the Middle East diplomatic Quartet failed to secure agreement on a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians after a series of separate meetings on Thursday.

Talks with Israeli envoy Yitzhak Molcho were hosted by the US embassy, with Washington represented by David Hale, assistant to US Middle East envoy George Mitchell, an embassy spokesman told AFP.

The European Union was represented by senior official Helga Schmid, said an EU official in Jerusalem.

Middle East envoys Sergei Yakovlev and Robert Serry also attended, representing Russia and the United Nations respectively, other diplomats said.

The envoys later met Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat, officials in the West Bank town of Ramallah said.

Richard Milton, spokesman for Serry, acknowledged that the two sides were still far apart.

The Quartet envoys were "seeing serious contradictions in the views of the parties on how to bring about resumed negotiations on all core issues, including borders and security," he told AFP.

"Quartet principles will meet in mid-April," a month later than planned, Milton said.

The Quartet is seeking to push the Israelis and Palestinians into renewing some kind of peace negotiations, which ran aground last September over an intractable dispute about Jewish settlements.

However, a Palestinian official told AFP on condition of anonymity that the Quartet's contacts on Thursday produced "no result" that would allow a resumption of dialogue.

"The meeting was unable to reach a result to resume the talks" between the two sides, the official said.

As the diplomats shuttled back and forth, Israeli and Palestinian media reports suggested Mitchell himself could make an appearance in the region next week after an absence of three months.

Diplomatic efforts to engage the two sides have increased ahead of a planned key meeting of Quartet principals that had been expected to take place in Paris later this month.

However, Erekat told AFP on Thursday the meeting of the Quartet -- which groups the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations -- has been delayed until April 15.

The Quartet meeting was to have taken place next week in Paris.

Israeli press reports had earlier suggested a postponement could possibly allow Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu time to float a "new" peace initiative.

Although details of Netanyahu's initiative have yet to be made public, close aides have been quoted as saying it involves establishing a Palestinian state on temporary borders in the framework of a long-term interim agreement -- in a plan to be outlined in Washington.

But Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad said on Thursday the time had come for the Israeli leader to lay his cards on the table.

"It is time for the international community to ask Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: does he accept the establishment of a Palestinian state on all the lands occupied in 1967 -- yes or no?" he told AFP on a visit to Jericho.

And he also rejected the idea of a temporary state.

"The only initiative that can work is one which leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state on all lands occupied in 1967 and not on part of it," Fayyad said.

Meanwhile, a spokesman for President Shimon Peres said he was seeking to secure an audience in Washington with US President Barack Obama in order to discuss options for reviving peace efforts.

Peres is one of a number of senior Israeli officials who has previously backed the idea of setting up a Palestinian state within provisional borders as part of an interim agreement.

Since the expiry last September of a temporary ban on settlement building -- which Netanyahu refused to extend -- the Palestinians have refused all direct contact with the Israelis, saying they will not talk while settlers build on land they want for a future state.
Print
1 ) mohamed / somalia
10/03/2011 22:05
interim agreement means to control palestinian daily life for and other century. no one will accept this idea.

2 ) marge / US
10/03/2011 22:15
Palestinians should not accept a US mediator, knowing full well that the US will represent Apartheid, Zionazi Israel only. Palestinians should demand another mediator, one that is impartial and will work on behalf of both parties. Palestinians can get another mediator if they refuse to be bought by US aid. Also, am surprised Erakat will still be part of any Palestinian negotiations, considering the revelations of the Palestine Papers. Anyway, hope he is a stronger person this time around.

3 ) Tobias / US
11/03/2011 05:43

The Quartet may talk peace, but the Palestinians and Israel won't,
since neither will make the required compromises, and thus
it is just a waste of time !!!


4 ) Tobias / US
11/03/2011 15:07
Marge,

Two things you should REMEMBER:

1- NO MEDIATOR CAN FORCE COMPROMISE, and the sides just
continue refusing to compromise enough for an agreement,
(even Mahatma Gandhi could bring them together), and

2- If "Palestinians refuse to be bought by US aid," and turn
to the EU or the UN they will again hear the same policy
"THE ONLY ROUTE TO STATEHOOD IS NEGOTIOTIONS,"
so Palestinians should also refuse EU and UN aid,
which will only add starvation to their prolonged stagnation !!

5 ) Tony B? / ME
11/03/2011 15:33
We defeated the Nazis during WWII. Now they are back in the form Pal terrorists, demanding the world help them resume the holocaust.
1967 boarders are indefensible. And Israel still has to defend itself against the PLO, same as with Hamas.

6 ) marge / USA
11/03/2011 18:12
@Tobias,

One, if not for the US using its veto to keep Palestinians enslaved to Apartheid Israel, the UN would give Palestinians a state the same as it gave Jews a state, without any compromise or negotiation with Arabs and Palestinians. US dishonesty and injustice is why Apartheid Israel has been able to steal most of Palestinian land and why Pals. have no state. Moreover, negotiate is just a scheme to force Pals. to accept Apartheid Israel's land theft since Pals. have no power to negotiate

7 ) marge / US
11/03/2011 18:55
@Tobias

Two, there is chance the UN and EU will agree to a Pal. state if no compromise can be found. Remember, the UN and EU parted ways with the US and voted for the UN Resolution condemning Apartheid Israel's illegal settlements. It is the dishonest, unjust, hypocrital US that is insisting on negotiations between Israel and the Pals.
Three, Palestinians do have the upper hand if they use it. They can deny Israel a jewish state by keeping it Apartheid or turning it into 1-State Democracy

8 ) marge / US
11/03/2011 19:15
Tony B?/ ME

Everybody in the world knows that todays nazis are the Zionazi Jews in Apartheid Israel, and your calling Palestinians or anyone "Nazis" is just part of your Hasbara lies and propaganda.

The world has to defeat Apartheid, Zionazi Israel if it is to survive and have peace.

The only thing Apartheid, Zionazi Israel has to defend is the "Terror Fund," which pays it millions of US dollars, if not billions, for fighting terror that it creates. Terror Fund is why Gaza is attacked
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

US: Kerry to meet chief PLO negotiator Monday
Thousands march across Gaza in solidarity with Jerusalem
Right-wing Jewish activist Yehuda Glick shot at Jerusalem rally

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014