اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Opinion: Why the sudden interest in East Jerusalem?
Published Thursday 26/04/2012 (updated) 30/04/2012 16:25
Israel has occupied East Jerusalem since 1967.

A flurry of visits by Arab and Islamic officials to East Jerusalem in the past few weeks has left Palestinians wondering what is happening.

Prince Hashem visited Jerusalem followed by a joint visit of Prince Ghazi and Mufti of Egypt Ali Gomaa. The head of Jordan’s security service, Hussein Majali, was the last to visit. His visit was followed by statements from Palestinian Islamic Waqf officials and the Israeli media that an important leader would be visiting soon.

All visits included a tour of Al-Aqsa Mosque, Islam's third holiest place of worship.

Jordan's agreement with Israel includes a clause stating that the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan has a special right and status vis-à-vis Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem.

Commentary regarding the visits was varied. There were those who said it was connected to the controversy over the bridge to the Maghreb gate. Months ago, Jordan intervened to defuse tension over Israel’s plans to tear down the existing passageway and rebuild it.

After Jordan’s intervention, Israel agreed to postpone the issue. Since further discussions and a possible decision are pending, Jordanian officials may have wanted to have a first-hand idea of the area and the issues connected with Israel’s plans.

Another motivation behind the sudden flurry of visits could very well be the future of East Jerusalem. Jordan, which has been playing an important role in facilitating Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, understands that the issue of Jerusalem is perhaps the biggest obstacle to any breakthrough.

Yet another issue that has been looming in recent months is the status of East Jerusalem’s Palestinian population. Numbering nearly 300,000, Palestinian residents of Jerusalem are officially a stateless population. Israel provided East Jerusalemites residency, but has been withdrawing it from many.

Israel says it is withdrawing residency rights for administrative reasons, a practice described by Palestinians as ethnic cleansing.

The current right-wing government of Premier Benjamin Netanyahu is said to have accelerated this process. As a result of the problems faced by the Palestinians, many opted to apply for Israeli citizenship, as an indirect way of safeguarding their right to their birthplace.

Palestinians from Jerusalem who obtain Israeli passports are asked to hand in their temporary Jordanian passports. In response, Jordan decided to deny those Palestinians entry into Jordan using their Israeli passports, even those who have close relatives in the Kingdom.

Israelis or Arab Israelis who are not from Jerusalem are routinely granted visas at the Sheikh Hussein Bridge. As the number of Palestinians receiving citizenship has risen in recent years, reportedly reaching 60,000, the issue has been brought back to Amman to rethink the policy.

The Jordanian minister of interior also made a surprise visit to Ramallah. Sources at the interior ministry say that Jordanian officials are divided between those who understand the reasons for trying to obtain Israeli citizenship and feel those individuals should not be singled out for punishment.

On the other hand, some feel that if the pressure of a ban is lifted, almost all East Jerusalemites may end up applying for Israeli citizenship.

In this regard, there is yet another point of view, suggesting that Jordan should offer citizenship to those interested because of their unique situation and because Israel is refusing to allow them to hold Palestinian passports.

Israel allows its citizens to hold second passports and thus an East Jerusalemite could easily have an Israeli and a Jordanian passport.

The sudden flurry of visits also came after the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, publicly called on all who can to visit Jerusalem as a statement of solidarity. Abbas said what Faisal Husseini said in this regard, namely that visiting a prisoner doesn't equate recognition of his jailers.

Jerusalemite Palestinians and the general Palestinian and Jordanian public are curious about the reason behind this sudden interest and wish they could be included in the discussion, rather than learn about it in the media.

Jordanian-Palestinian relations have improved considerably in recent decades. The friendly relationship and trust between King Abdullah and Abbas are obvious to all concerned.

Jordan's persistent and unwavering support to the Palestinian cause, in word and deed, are beyond reproach.
Print Send to friend
1 ) Mo / Jordan
26/04/2012 13:41
"Jordan's persistent and unwavering support to the Palestinian cause, in word and deed, are beyond reproach." No, Jordan's support to the status quo, which protects the PLO and their special relationship with the west is beyond reproach. I would argue the PLO is detrimental to the palestinian cause.

2 ) @ Mo #1 / USA
26/04/2012 16:12
Do you remember Black September, when Jordan's King
ordered 1,000s of Palestinian civilians killed in 1970 ??

3 ) Jareer / Palestine
26/04/2012 16:22
Indeed, supporting the "Palestinian cause" has no bearing on supporting Palestinians themselves, apparently. That last sentence in the essay sounds like a North Korean communique. Not that I necessarily want Jordanian support, mind you, or that of any other Arab regime. Far from it.

4 ) Colin Wright / USA
26/04/2012 22:10
Jordan has been in an impossible position since 1948. It's something of a miracle that it hasn't descended into murderous chaos and stayed there.

5 ) downtown dave / USA
28/04/2012 12:55
The issue of Jerusalem is a problem for those who don't understand that this is the place where God has chosen to put His Name...this is the place where Jesus will set up His kingdom and rule the world. God shares His glory with no one, and besides Him, there is no other god. http://483years.blogspot.com/

6 ) johnny benson / usa
29/04/2012 08:02
jordan could have let the palestinians set up their own gov....after 48 until 67......never did ...why ..nobody considered the pals. as a seperate prople...just arabs....like any arab in the levant.....now that israel sits on the west bank...the palestinians were invented to push back....very clever

7 ) southparkbear / usa
01/05/2012 21:41
no #2, cuz there were between 10,000 to 20,000 palestinian killed that month and not 1000 as you said

8 ) firoz osman / south africa
03/05/2012 21:29
The history of Jordan's Royal family is one one of betrayal to the Palestinian cause. Treachery is etched into their DNA. The visit by the Jordanian Minister and Egypt's mufti (scholars for dollars) praised by PA's Mahmud Abbas are all terrified of their thrones after the Arab Spring. They will be buried together with Israel in the desert sands.

9 ) Paul / South Africa
13/05/2012 11:29
A known expoiter of Black South Africans, firoz osman seems to be a "holier than thou" prophet.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Analysis: Salam Fayyad doomed by Israeli and Palestinian enemies alike
Saeb Erekat: 65 years of impunity
Israel army doubts third intifada but on alert

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2013