اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

PLO lobbies for convincing win in UN vote
Published Tuesday 30/10/2012 (updated) 01/11/2012 16:26
A girl pictured holding a Palestinian flag in front of Israeli soldiers.
By Noah Browning and Ali Sawafta

RAMALLAH (Reuters) -- Palestinians have launched a diplomatic blitz aimed at garnering a strong majority for a vote granting them non-member statehood at the United Nations slated for next month, officials said Tuesday.

Despite heading for a sure victory in the UN General Assembly, mostly consisting of post-colonial states historically sympathetic to the Palestinians, West Bank diplomats are courting European countries to further burnish their campaign.

"From the EU we will have a minimum of 12 votes and maybe up to 15, as some are not yet decided," Wasel Abu Yousef, a member of the PLO, told Reuters. There are 27 nations within the European Union.

Palestinian officials say that they can count on around 115 'yes' votes, mostly from Arab, African, Latin American, and Asian states, and expect around 22 no-votes, led by the United States, and 56 abstentions in the 193-member organization.

Frustrated in their request for full statehood last year amid US opposition at the United Nations Security Council, Palestinians have launched a watered-down bid for recognition as an "observer state" -- the same status given to the Vatican.

Senior Palestinian officials have fanned out around the globe to press their case, including a meeting in Paris with French President Francois Hollande at the weekend.

Speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks, a Palestinian official said they hoped to flip a possible French abstention into a yes-vote, while other waverers might also switch position nearer the date.

Israel and the United States have sharply criticized the Palestinian initiative, arguing that such unilateral moves are in violation of the 1993 Oslo accords, which were intended to pave the way to a "final status agreement" within five years.

While Israel expects to lose the forthcoming vote, it is anxious to see leading Western democracies vote against, or at worst abstain. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also met Hollande on Tuesday and was expected to raise the issue.

In Europe, the Netherlands, Czech Republic and Georgia were among 5 nations that looked set to vote 'no', the Palestinian official said.

Likely punishment

Palestinians see the upgrade as international recognition of the lines predating the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. They say this will then be the reference point in future peace talks.

President Mahmoud Abbas has pledged to restart the talks, stalled since 2010 over settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, "straightaway", inferring he would drop a Palestinian precondition for a halt to the building work.

The top Palestinian peace negotiator told local newspapers on Tuesday of likely American and Israeli economic punishment should Palestinians win the upgrade.

Saeb Erekat wrote of contingencies including US divestment from UN agencies and withdrawal of financial aid as well as the withholding by Israel of $100 million in monthly customs payments that the Palestinian Authority needs to remain afloat.

The US could "freeze all or some of the funding for the Palestinian National Authority ... put pressure on other governments to discourage them from providing support and/or reduce their aid to Palestine," he warned.

Since last year's campaign, the US has withheld $192 million in economic assistance to the broke, aid-dependent Palestinian Authority and stopped funding the UN cultural body UNESCO after it admitted Palestine as a member.

Economic anxiety is on the rise in the West Bank following US sanctions and an aid shortfall from rich Gulf states last year, leading to delayed public sector salaries and fuel price hikes which provoked violent street demonstrations last month.

The vote is set to be called on Nov. 15 or 29. Palestinian sources said the first date was more likely because it was closer to US presidential elections on Nov. 6, giving Washington less time to organize a lobbying campaign.
Print Send to friend
1 ) Tibi / Tubas
30/10/2012 17:23
The PLO are a bunch of fools, because:
1- the UNGA can NOT give Palestine borders, and
2- when Palestine becomes a state without borders, what the PLO and Hamas control (Areas A/B & Gaza) will become sovereign Palestine, and
3- Israel will never agree to give any more lands to Palestine, and
4- Israel will probably end all Oslo agreements (taxes & trade), and
take advantage of Palestine's Area A/B that has NO access to the outside world, except through Israeli controlled areas !!!!

2 ) Oliveland / Palestine
30/10/2012 18:53
Need to get the colonial England,France and Italy (without Berlusconi new Gov might go for it ). If that is achieved then the rest will follow sooner or later .

3 ) Nour / 1-State
30/10/2012 19:12
The crusaders's old grudge is still alive and kicking. It has simply put on a new coat... The Zionist-western itch to torment Palestinians and deny them their human, political rights to nationhood and independence.

4 ) GO PLO / GAZA IS
30/10/2012 19:56
NEXT

5 ) Mel / USA
30/10/2012 21:44
Don't expect much from Froggie Hollande,LOL! He is in the middle-right now-along with Riyadh,Qatar,Ankara &D.C. of pulling a coup on Shia Islam in Syria using Islamist extremists just as D.C. &Riyadh,secretly agreed to fund the "mujahedeen"(50-50)in AfPak,to the tune of $6 BILLION in Feb'80.Hollande must se himself as another Count

6 ) Mel / USA
30/10/2012 22:03
cont:Hollande?considers himself a new Count Alexandre de Marenches with his 'Safari Club'(not supporting an Islamic-regime in Iran,this time)against Syria,trying to get at Russia again(in Syria now)?Using the old tried &"trusted" extremist proxy,mujahideen,attacking Shiites&indirectly getting at the Russians"atheists"that Saudi Wahhabi's loathe(&fear)so much? http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=alexandre_de_marenches_1
Here we go round the Mulberry Bush,again,http://siyasipakistan.w

7 ) Mohamad Shahin / Paterson, New Jersey
31/10/2012 00:40
You said it Nour! It is their full right. That is incontestable!

8 ) Robby / USA
31/10/2012 01:33
So there will no longer be refugees since there will be a Palestine? We should halt our UNRWA funding immediately.

9 ) Yehuda Solomon / Israel
31/10/2012 04:09
Our PM, Foreign Ministry, diplomats and government should all stop acting like a bunch of stark raving mad jackasses-on-steroids. They are all acting like a bunch of damn, crazy-assed, maniacal lunatics thinking the sky is going to fall if the U.N. Palestinian upgrade happens (source: "Israel may 'go crazy' after UN bid, its own diplomats warn," MNA, updated 29/10/2012). It WILL happen, OVERWHELMINGLY. We CAN handle it. I've posted before the U.S. should (at least) abstain from the vote.

10 ) gabi / australia
31/10/2012 07:33
# 8 Robby - you're a bit of a dill, aren't you? Will the refugees all disappear miraculously if the Palestinians get UN non-member statehood? Or will Israel let them in??? Haha, just joshing - of course they won't. They'll react like spoilt children and make life even tougher for the Palestinians. So the refugees will still be there. BTW how much funding do you personally give to UNRWA? Or are you speaking for all the US when you say "we."

11 ) Jafar M. Ramini / UK
31/10/2012 09:50
Like a moth to the flame our so called leaders continue on the same path that will inevitably lead to ruin. I said it before and I'll say again. Israel/USA are not interested in peace. Why? Because they don't profit from peace. Their war economies are just that "WAR" economies. They thrive on conflict and chaos. Just look at what's happening in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain and Syria and judge for yourselves. Why are we ignored? Why are we not consulted? Because we are irrelevant.

12 ) Tibi / Tubas
31/10/2012 21:06
The "PLO lobbies for convincing win in UN vote", that will change nothing
for the better, but it will make PA finances much worse real fast,
and still they plan to shoot themselves in foot, rather than take
THE ONLY ROUTE TO STATEHOOD - NEGOTIATIONS, and until then
60% of the West Bank (Area C) continues down the path of East Jerusalem, which was already annexed, as forever part of the Jewish State of Israel.

13 ) Big Mike / USA
31/10/2012 21:44
1 ) Tibi , Why not Izrael doesn't have borders unless you want to claim UN Res 181 lines which includes nothing of Jerusalem at all.

14 ) Giacomo / USA
01/11/2012 15:21
After 9 defensive wars, 2 multi-year state-sponsored intifadas, ongoing threats to analiate Jews by the PLO, Hamas, and their sponsors the Arab League and Iran over 100 years, let's hope the UN grants status. And once they rule that the occupation is legal and justified, based on the above as they did in the Palmer Report, then what? That's right, negotiate a sustainable peace agreement based on '67 borders with land swaps to end the war and occupation. As could have been done anytime.

15 ) @ BM-13 / \ Tibi/Tubas
01/11/2012 15:37
"Nothing of Jerusalem" was part of an Arab state, in "UN Res 181" either !!
FYI, the Holy City was to be "International", and besides when convenient, the Arabs states freely ignored the UN Resolutions 181 & 242, and even their four 1949 signed armistice agreements with Israel.
So now, Israel should be able to just as freely ignore such resolutions,
and besides, the United Nation's Position at this time is that
NEGOTIATIONS ARE THE ONLY ROUTE TO PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD.

16 ) Tobias / USA
01/11/2012 17:03
Erekat warns of US/Israeli retaliation after the UN bid and punitive measures in response to Palestinian bid to upgrade to non-member state, but
the PLO/Fatah government will have only itself to blame for a "state of internal chaos" that results when the US (& other donors) and Israel discontinue supplying to the Palestinian Authority, what "non-member state Palestine" is no longer entitled to receive (donations, trade, etc.) !!!

17 ) gabi / australia
02/11/2012 00:52
# 16 - I know your views on the Palestinians From what I've read of your various posts you regard them as worthless people. But tell me why would Israel warn of "punitive measures" Why such threats? The answer is because they have the weapons, with the US funding them. If Israel behaved in a half-way decent manner they would not be looked on with such odium throughout the rest of the world. But their biggest weapon is to use the term anti-semite against anyone who questions their actions.

18 ) Robby / USA
02/11/2012 02:44
10 ) gabi / australia - I was being sarcastic, the Arab world would never grant the children/grandchildren of the original refugees their freedom. There are even "Palestinian Refugees" in Gaza, which is run by the Palestinians. My country (with my tax dollars) is the largest contributor to the UNRWA budget, hundreds of millions of dollars to help Arab countries enforce their apartheid system. If the Arab countries want to suppress more generations then let them pay for it themselves.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Bahar: We don't intervene in Egypt's internal affairs
Group: 4 Palestinian refugees killed in Syria
Israeli troops raid Beit Jala training center

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2013