اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

HRW: Tougher UAE Internet dissent law shuts door to free speech
Published Wednesday 28/11/2012 (updated) 30/11/2012 00:36
Font- Font+
UAE Prime Minister and Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid
al-Maktoum pictured in Dubai. (Reuters/Jumana ElHeloueh, File)
DUBAI (Reuters) -- The United Arab Emirates has "effectively closed the country's remaining forum for free speech" with a decree issued earlier this month that tightened the law on online dissent, Human Rights Watch said on Wednesday.

The US-allied UAE, a Gulf trading and tourism hub and big oil producer, has not seen the serious unrest that has toppled four Arab heads of state since early last year. But it has shown little tolerance of open dissent, and more than 60 members of an Islamist group have been detained since the start of the year.

The decree by President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahayan imposes prison sentences for anyone who derides or caricatures the Gulf Arab country's rulers or state institutions on the web, the state news agency WAM reported on Nov. 12.

"The UAE's cybercrimes decree reflects an attempt to ban even the most tempered criticism," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch.

"The determination to police and punish online dissent, no matter how mild, is incompatible with the image UAE rulers are trying to promote of a progressive, tolerant nation."

A source close to the UAE government said on Wednesday the decree aimed to address technological advances in communications that could affect the rights and beliefs of people.

"This decree does not restrict freedom of expression, which is guaranteed by the UAE constitution," the source said. "The decree represents an extension of legislation to cover a wide variety of potential offenses in many fields, including terrorism, human trafficking, money laundering and identity theft."

Possible prison terms

WAM said the amendments "stipulate penalties of imprisonment on any person who creates or runs an electronic website or uses any information technology medium to deride or damage the reputation or stature of the state or any of its institutions".

This included the president, the vice president, any of the rulers of the seven emirates that make up the UAE, crown princes, deputy rulers, the national flag, the national anthem, the emblem of the state or any of its symbols.

Social networking sites have enlivened public discourse in the UAE, a major oil exporter and business hub, where state media are tightly controlled and freedom of speech restricted.

People across UAE society, from ruling family members to ministers, government supporters and dissidents, make use of sites such as Twitter and Facebook.

The amendments announced on Nov. 12 cover a wide range of offenses, including outlawing the use of the Internet for human trafficking and prostitution.

But they include jail terms for "any person publishing any information, news, caricatures or any other kind of pictures that would pose threats to the security of the state and to its highest interests or violate its public order," said WAM.

In addition, anyone who uses the Internet "to call for demonstrations, marches and similar activities without a license being obtained in advance from the competent authorities" could also face imprisonment.

Human Rights Watch said the decree's vaguely worded provisions provide a legal basis to prosecute and jail people who use information technology to criticize senior officials, demand political reforms or organize unlicensed demonstrations.

"Although some provisions are aimed at preventing the proliferation of racist or sectarian views online, the principal effect of the law is severe restrictions on the rights to free expression and free association and assembly," the New York-based watchdog said.
Print
1 ) shirley / australia
29/11/2012 21:45
whosa side are you on MAAN NEWS you would not be going to UN if it were not for backing and courage of these countries Iran could not get you there and Iran is atHEOCRACY it is no democracy so why do you continue witrh your rabid articles and support for IRan agianst arab states and US greatest allies are monarchies like australia and Britain tired of your pro US / Iran seesaw articles written by zionists and US stoogeshope you are one of the first changes iHRW are amnesty are liars have no cred
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Families of 16 journalists killed in Gaza demand justice
MADA: July bloodiest month in history of Palestinian media
South African counselor visits Ma'an HQ

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014