اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Analysis: Israeli vote is least of neighbors' worries
Published Monday 21/01/2013 (updated) 02/02/2013 21:31
Font- Font+
The banners read (L and C) "Only Netanyahu will protect Jerusalem"
and "Warning! '67 borders ahead". (Reuters/Ronen Zvulun)

JERUSALEM (Reuters) -- A hardline Israeli government or a very hardline one.

With those widely viewed as the likeliest outcomes of Tuesday's election in Israel, the ballot has aroused minimal interest from Middle Eastern states who once scrutinized such votes for clues about the fate of the so-called peace process.

Whether they endorsed US-backed negotiations with the Palestinians or were out to sabotage them, regional powers would see Israeli polls at least as significant straws in the wind.

Not this time, when the only questions appear to be the size of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's re-election victory and whether he will rely for coalition partners on sworn foes of any territorial compromise with the Palestinians, or seek to include "centrist" parties still formally committed to the quest for an increasingly implausible two-state solution.

Mustapha Kamal Al-Sayyid, a professor of political science at Cairo University, said Arabs were paying little attention to an election destined only to shift Israel further to the right.

"The chances of a peaceful settlement are already thin under Netanyahu, but they would be even more remote under a new Israeli government dominated by rightist parties," he said.

In the United States, Israel's indispensable ally, President Barack Obama may be reluctant to embark on a new drive to break the Middle East deadlock in his second term after US-brokered talks in the first term collapsed almost immediately.

Netanyahu has shifted the whole political terrain to the right, imposing "the language of security, violence and control rather than a language of peace, reconciliation or compromise", argued senior PLO official Hanan Ashrawi.

"Unfortunately that has dominated the whole election campaign," she told Reuters.

Regional flux

The region also has more compelling worries than a seemingly predictable parliamentary poll, Israel's first since Arab uprisings erupted two years ago, reshaping the Middle East.

The upheaval's biggest scalp so far is Hosni Mubarak, who preserved Egypt's 1979 peace treaty with Israel for 30 years.

An Islamist leader, Muhammad Mursi, is now in power, saying he will not scrap the pact. But videotapes that surfaced this month of speeches he made in 2010 as a Muslim Brotherhood leader have alarmed Israelis and others with their crude anti-Semitic remarks and calls for children to be taught to hate Israel.

Yet Israel's election is hardly uppermost in the minds of Egyptians, who Al-Sayyid said were preoccupied with this week's anniversary of the anti-Mubarak revolt, their own next election and economic difficulties exacerbated by political turmoil.

Syria's devastating civil war and the ousting of leaders in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen have largely overshadowed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, despite Israel's brief war in November in the Gaza Strip.

Hamas and its more moderate rivals, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, have renewed attempts to heal their feud since the Gaza conflict. Neither faction has high expectations from the Israeli election.

"Palestinians have no option except to unite against the Zionist enemy (Israel), whose extremism increases every day," Osama Hamdan, the leader of Hamas in Lebanon, told reporters in Gaza on Sunday in a terse comment on the Israeli vote.

Netanyahu, playing on his security credentials, has tried to keep the focus on perceived external threats, especially Iran's nuclear program, while vowing to promote Jewish settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, both captured, along with the Gaza Strip, in the 1967 war.

"The problem in the Middle East is Iran's attempt to build nuclear weapons, the chemical weapons in Syria and the Islamist radicalism spreading in Africa, threatening to sweep the entire region," the prime minister told his cabinet on Sunday.

A day earlier, he said Iran, the Lebanese Shiite Islamist group Hezbollah and Hamas were keenly following the Israeli election to gauge whether his ruling party had grown or shrunk.

"They want a weak Israel, a divided one, and the most challenged country in the world must not be divided," he said, after opinion polls showed his sizable lead was declining.

Khamanei's concerns

Hardline media in Iran have indeed forecast that Netanyahu's Likud party, running jointly with the ultra-nationalist Yisrael Beitenu faction, will fare worse than expected in the polls.

"Contrary to Netanyahu's predictions, the Likud party and its main ally Yisrael Beitenu will be in a weaker position," wrote Sadollah Zarei in Kayhan newspaper, whose editor is considered close to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

But Meir Javedanfar, lecturer in Iranian politics at the Interdisciplinary Center at Herzliya, Israel, said the election rated relatively low on the scale of challenges faced by Iran.

"What Iran's supreme leader probably cares most about is: will the next Israeli government isolate Israel's position in the international community and damage its relations with the EU and US through more settlement building?

"If the answer is yes, then Khamenei will probably sleep easier at night, because he most probably knows that an isolated Israel will find it difficult to justify a unilateral military attack against Iran's nuclear sites," Javedanfar said.

Iran denies seeking atom bombs, but has been markedly secretive about some of its nuclear activity. It points to Israel, widely believed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, as the main threat to regional peace and security.

Iran's ally Hezbollah is always an avid monitor of its arch-enemy, but the Israeli election can hardly rank with the group's anxiety about the possible fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad and the loss of its overland arms lifeline from Tehran.

As for the Palestinians, they can only watch in dismay as their cause is eclipsed as a concern for Israeli voters fed up with failed peacemaking and as Netanyahu elevates Iran's nuclear ambitions to the pinnacle of his national agenda.

"He presents Iran as a strategic threat to Israel, and he attempts to present the Palestinian question as a domestic issue under Israeli control," the PLO's Ashrawi said.

"People who know better understand that the Palestinian question is the real existential issue when it comes to Israel - it's the key to peace, legitimacy and stability throughout the region, whereas Iran can be dealt with politically."
Print
1 ) Carlos / usa
21/01/2013 16:15
The only alternative is to help israel see the error of its ways with Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. I did my part. When I bought a computer I used AMD processors. israel manufactures intel processors and I will encourage others to buy computers with only AMD processors. BTW it is lightning fast.

2 ) Around / World
21/01/2013 16:57
The two state solution is reality - no need to talk about it any more. The State of Palestine was declared by Abbas last year and admitted to UN as a non-member state. 138 UN member states voted for it. So now Palestine is another state which has territorial/border dispute with its neighbor. There are more than 60 UN member states have territorial / border disputes with neighbor – even largest countries like China, Russia, Great Britain have such disputes. Palestine is just one them.

3 ) MEL / USA
21/01/2013 19:23
#1 Carlos/usa When your doctor offers a family member an endoscopy please tell him about your BDS. Because you will not want the world's smallest video camera - a camera with a 0.99 mm diameter, designed to fit in a tiny endoscope designed by Medigus. Or the first Capsule endoscopy solution to record images of the digestive tract. The capsule is the size and shape of a pill and contains a tiny camera, to be used. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_inventions_and_discoveries

4 ) Colin Wright / USA
21/01/2013 21:16
'List_of_Israeli_inventions_and_discoveries' It'd be fun to edit THAT. In fact, I think I'll go slip a little something in right now...

5 ) Abu / India
21/01/2013 23:42
I agree with Colin USA. I am also staying away from all the companies which are in the list of boycott as a part of BDS movement. No more maggie, no nestle products, no loreal, no estie laudr, no HP computers, no intel chips. I will do my bit to support BDS as much as I can by refraining to use these products as well as promote bds in my friends circle to the maximum for more awareness creation. BDS is getting success already slowly but surely.

6 ) Outlier / USA
22/01/2013 01:30
Sadly, the Palestinians and Israelis never miss and opportunity to miss an opportunity when it comes to peace. It may take another generation for this dysfunctional twosome to get on the same page at the same time on making a lasting peace, to the detriment of both.

7 ) ian / australia
22/01/2013 04:27
#1 (cc #3) And when you need to "neutralize immediately a dangerous person" you will NOT want the MagnoShocker (which combines a metal detector and a taser) ANOTHER Israeli invention. Tell THEM about BDS!

8 ) @ Abu-5 / BDS
22/01/2013 17:58
Your personal boycott will NOT harm Israel, but if you want
your personal boycott to be complete, you should note that likely:
- the computer you used to post a comment has Israeli made chips,
- so does your cell phone, and
- many of the medicines that keep your familiy alive,
so please do a more complete personal boycott of Israel.

9 ) ian / australia
23/01/2013 02:43
'The banners read..."Only Netanyahu will protect Jerusalem" and "Warning! '67 borders ahead".' What's astonishing is how illegal both propositions are regarded by the rest of the world and arguably constitute incitement to racial hatred. Pretty weird really: the election slogans of an ostensibly first-world democracy (indeed the incumbent) boldly promising when elected to brazenly break the law and turn the county into a detested international pariah. Stay classy Israel.

10 ) ian / australia
23/01/2013 02:57
#8 "Your personal boycott will NOT harm Israel, but if you want your personal boycott to be complete, you should note that likely...etc. etc." At least Abu / India probably doesn't use the MagnoShocker without realising it. It's not the sort of thing you'd forget.

11 ) johnny benson / usa
02/02/2013 03:54
,,,,,while you guys are at it.....lets name one just one medical discovery made by an arab country.......by the way i love my desert eagle....and my mini-uzi

12 ) James / UK
07/02/2013 22:59
BDS gives more popularity to Israeli's product and last I checked their efforts it backfires BDS. Some ppl think that oh, the BDS is doing what it is supposed to do, but NO, it does not bring any benefit to Palis cause. The organizers of the BDS only gets donations to fill in their pockets and what do we see? nothing.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Analysis: The PLO must stop buying time
Analysis: Donor complicity in Israeli violations of Palestinian rights
Naftali Bennett West Bank annexation plan a wake up call for the West

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014