اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Netanyahu claims election victory
Published Tuesday 22/01/2013 (updated) 23/01/2013 22:18
Font- Font+

JERUSALEM (Reuters) -- Hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emerged the bruised winner of Israel's election on Tuesday, claiming victory despite unexpected losses to resurgent center-left challengers.

Exit polls showed the Israeli leader's Likud party, yoked with the ultra-nationalist Yisrael Beitenu group, would still be the biggest bloc in the 120-member assembly with 31 seats, 11 fewer than the 42 they held in the previous parliament.

If the exit polls compiled by three local broadcasters prove correct - and they normally do in Israel - Netanyahu would be on course for a third term in office, perhaps leading a hardline coalition that would promote Jewish settlement on occupied land.

But his weakened showing in an election he himself called earlier than necessary could complicate the struggle to forge an alliance with a stable majority in parliament.

The 63-year-old Israeli leader promised during his election campaign to focus on tackling Iran's nuclear ambitions if he won, shunting Palestinian peacemaking well down the agenda despite Western concern to keep the quest for a solution alive.

The projections showed right-wing parties with a combined strength of 61-62 seats against 58-59 for the center-left.

"According to the exit poll results, it is clear that Israel's citizens have decided that they want me to continue in the job of prime minister of Israel and to form as broad a government as possible," Netanyahu wrote on his Facebook page.

The centrist Yesh Atid (There is a Future) party, led by former television talk show host Yair Lapid, came second with 18 or 19 seats, exit polls showed - a stunning result for a newcomer to politics in a field of 32 contending parties.

Lapid won support amongst middle-class, secular voters by promising to resolve a growing housing shortage, abolish military draft exemptions for Jewish seminary students and seek an overhaul of the failing education system.

The once dominant Labour party led by Shelly Yachimovich was projected to take third place with 17 seats.

'Yesh Atid sweep'

The mood was subdued at Netanyahu's Likud party election headquarters after the polls closed, with only a few hundred supporters in a venue that could house thousands.

"We anticipated we would lose some votes to Lapid, but not to this extent. This was a Yesh Atid sweep," Likud campaign adviser Ronen Moshe told Reuters.

A prominent Likud lawmaker, Danny Danon, told CNN: "We will reach out to everybody who is willing to join our government, mainly the center party of Yair Lapid."

If the prime minister can tempt Lapid to join a coalition, the ultra-Orthodox religious parties who often hold the balance of power in parliament might lose some of their leverage.

After a lackluster campaign, Israelis voted in droves on a sunny winter day, registering a turnout of 66.6 percent, the highest since 2003. That buoyed center-left parties which had pinned their hopes on energizing an army of undecided voters against Netanyahu and his nationalist-religious allies.

Opinion polls before the election had predicted an easy win for Netanyahu, although the last ones suggested he would lose some votes to the Jewish Home party, which opposes a Palestinian state and advocates annexing chunks of the occupied West Bank.

The exit polls projected 12 seats for Jewish Home.

Full election results are due by Wednesday morning and official ones will be announced on Jan. 30. After that, President Shimon Peres is likely to ask Netanyahu, as leader of the biggest bloc in parliament, to try to form a government.

The former commando has traditionally looked to religious, conservative parties for backing and is widely expected to seek out self-made millionaire Naftali Bennett, who heads the Jewish Home party and stole much of the limelight during the campaign.

But Netanyahu might, as Danon suggested, try to include more moderate parties to assuage Western concerns about Israel's increasingly hardline approach to the Palestinians.

Western anxiety

British Foreign Secretary William Hague warned Israel on Tuesday it was losing international support, saying prospects for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were almost dead because of expanding Jewish settlements.

US-brokered peace talks broke down in 2010 amid mutual acrimony. Since then Israel has accelerated construction in the West Bank and east Jerusalem - land the Palestinians want for their future state - much to the anger of Western partners.

Netanyahu's relations with US President Barack Obama have been notably tense and Martin Indyk, a former US ambassador to Israel, told the BBC the election was unlikely to change that.

"President Obama doesn't have high expectations that there's going to be a government in Israel committed to making peace and is capable of the kind of very difficult and painful concessions that would be needed to achieve a two-state solution," he said.

Tuesday's vote is the first in Israel since Arab uprisings swept the region two years ago, reshaping the Middle East.

Netanyahu, who had a first term as premier in the late 1990s, has said the turbulence, which has brought Islamist governments to power in several countries long ruled by secularist autocrats, including neighbouring Egypt, shows the importance of strengthening national security.

He views Iran's nuclear programme as a mortal threat and has vowed not to let Tehran enrich enough uranium to make a single nuclear bomb - a threshold Israeli experts say could arrive as early as mid-2013.

Iran denies it is planning to build the bomb, and says Israel, widely believed to have the only nuclear arsenal in the Middle East, is the biggest threat to the region.

The issue barely registered during the election campaign, with a poll in Haaretz newspaper on Friday saying 47 percent of Israelis thought social and economic issues were the most pressing concern, against just 10 percent who cited Iran.

One of the first problems to face the next government, which is unlikely to take power before the middle of next month at the earliest, is the stuttering economy.

Data last week showed the budget deficit rose to 4.2 percent of gross domestic product in 2012, double the original estimate, meaning spending cuts and tax hikes look certain.
Print
1 ) US / Taxpayer
23/01/2013 02:15
Im against using drones,but I will make an exception.

2 ) ian / australia
23/01/2013 06:34
So...more of the wily silver comb-over. No surprise there. Of interest is moderate Yesh Atid doing better than Jewish Home and that Bibi may have to stiff Naftali Bennett to reassure moderate Israelis and save face internationally. But he's admitted his central strategy: going on and on about the non-existent threat of nuclear Iran to deflect attention from everything else (esp. Palestinian statehood and settlements). He's shrewd enough to know being too extreme is a problem (shrewder than fiery

3 ) ian / australia
23/01/2013 06:35
(contd.) Naftali Bennett) and will most likely back down to some degree on E-1. So, more of the same I expect: dissembling, obfuscation, intransigence, bluster, slyness, and the odd outburst of murderous violence. Bibi-style.

4 ) Mark of Lewiston / USA
23/01/2013 10:02
Abbas could throw a real wrench in the works by making a very public and very detailed and reasonable peace offer, with maps for land swaps, in the next day or two, covering all contingencies and issues. Peace was not debated in the Israeli elections except in the most general terms. Specifics would throw Netanyahu for a loop and complicate his coalition building enormously.

5 ) Peeping Tom / Down Under
23/01/2013 10:02
Photo gives a feeling that he is easing himself

6 ) Colin Wright / USA
24/01/2013 01:32
To Ian #3 'So, more of the same I expect: dissembling, obfuscation, intransigence, bluster, slyness, and the odd outburst of murderous violence. Bibi-style.' How is this distinct from ordinary Zionism?

7 ) Colin Wright / USA
24/01/2013 01:58
To Mark of L #4 'Abbas could throw a real wrench in the works by making a very public and very detailed and reasonable peace offer, with maps for land swaps, in the next day or two, covering all contingencies and issues....' The problem with that is that it then becomes the starting point for negotiations. 'Okay, well, we're not going to give you ALL of the 22% you want. How's about a fair compromise? 11%?' Besides, Israel never keeps deals. There's really very little point.

8 ) Colin Wright / USA
24/01/2013 02:01
To ian #2 'But he's admitted his central strategy: going on and on about the non-existent threat of nuclear Iran to deflect...' It's pretty revealing how that issue all but vanished after Israel gave up on it. Surely the 'threat' wasn't simply an Israeli propaganda ploy?

9 ) ian / australia
24/01/2013 23:06
#4 An appealing idea Mark of Lewiston: shining a light on secret talks and Israeli obstructionism, for leverage/pressure of some kind...but is it too reliant on Israel suddenly being reasonable faced with a reasonable Palestinian offer? All indications are Israel will be "reasonable" only when bludgeoned into it. "Negotiations" has always been euphemistic: a fancy name for what's really going on. As I see it, Palestine CANNOT be LESS than the WB on '67 line (and Gaza) inc. Old City and the Aqsa.

10 ) ian / australia
24/01/2013 23:06
(contd.) Anything less, Palestinians couldn't live with and would rightly see as a "negotiation" where they got screwed. But absent someone with a big stick (obviously involving US aid), the proposal would be scoffed at (esp. in the US). Israeli propaganda has carefully laid the groundwork to make a proposal on those lines seem greedy (uppity) and against received wisdom (the Jews having returned to their ancient home and eternal, undivided capital!) They're nifty that way, spinning something

11 ) ian / australia
24/01/2013 23:07
(contd.) so illegal into something the gullible "know" is right. I think the PA should argue that "negotiations" is the wrong model, that it's exhausted and has produced nothing, and that where the international courts (ICJ) have already ruled on the LEGALITY of the competing claims, the idea of "negotiating" about it further is absurd and unecessary.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

PA security forces vow to continue crackdown on outlaws
Hamas official: National unity govt mandate expires Dec. 2
Clashes as Israeli soldiers raid attack suspects' homes

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014