اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Universal Periodic Review, human rights, and Israel
Published Tuesday 29/01/2013 19:46
Font- Font+

If the Israeli government is not careful, it will ruin an important global human rights process for everybody.

The Universal Periodic Review, a process to examine states’ human rights records, has until now been truly universal: all United Nations member states were reviewed by the end of 2011 and the second cycle of reviews has already started.

But now the government of Israel is not engaging with the process. Every indication is that the Israel will not be present today when it is scheduled to be examined under the Universal Periodic Review. As the only recalcitrant state among 193, Israel’s deliberate absence would sabotage the principle of universality. Consequently the Universal Periodic Review stands to lose the compelling legitimacy it derives from being applied evenhandedly to all states. Why should states that would prefer to escape scrutiny of their human rights record, or are severely resource constrained, submit to this process if Israel’s non-compliance demonstrates that it is no longer universal?

Not so long ago, Israel, and many other states and organizations, had expressed concerns that the Commission on Human Rights was biased and operated on double standards. It was abolished and in 2006 the Human Rights Council was established. With it came a great improvement: the Universal Periodic Review. Finally, a process applied consistently to all states was at hand, and in its first cycle of reviews, it worked. It is ironic that Israel is now undermining a mechanism that was designed to remedy the bias Israel protested against.

The Israeli government complained that the Human Rights Council singled Israel out for criticism by establishing a Fact-Finding Mission on Israeli Settlements in March 2012, and consequently withdrew its cooperation with the Council. Israel had already refused to cooperate with several important mechanisms such as the Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict in 2009. Yet those steps are unrelated to the Universal Periodic Review.

Amnesty International voices the worldwide consensus in urging Israel to participate in its Universal Periodic Review during 2013, in accordance with the rules of the Human Rights Council. Anything less than Israeli engagement at senior level will weaken the effectiveness of the mechanism. Even Israel’s best friends will be hard put to defend such actions. According to the Human Rights Council protocol, appropriate measures will be taken in relation to states that persistently refuse to co-operate with the Universal Periodic Review.

There is evidence that for many countries throughout the world the Universal Periodic Review has contributed to narrowing the gap between human rights standards and their implementation. It would be a great loss to the global human rights project if the Universal Periodic Review were jeopardized.

If Israel fails to fully engage in its examination under the Universal Periodic Review during 2013 as required, will the victims of human rights violations, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, thank the Israeli government?

Peter Splinter is Amnesty International’s representative to the United Nations in Geneva.
Print
1 ) Giacomo / USA
31/01/2013 00:20
So now Israel will be "thanked" for "human rights violations, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe", even though it has absolutely nothing to do with the tragedies and travesties in those countries? Is Israel to blame for the Titanic too -- no, that was an ICEberg. You inadvertently reinforce Israel's point Peter, that the proceedings are bias from the outset.

2 ) Phil / UK
31/01/2013 18:33
"If the Israeli government is not careful, it will ruin an important global human rights process for everybody."

Would you care to tell us who the "everybody" you have in mind actually is? Because the UN is home to many of the worst human rights abusers on the planet. But they constantly vote themselves clean bills of health, whilst condemning Israel, whom they are not fit to be in the same room with. The UN is corrupt, worthless, and its human rights record is a joke.


3 ) Robert / US
01/02/2013 14:47
#1 & 2 lie & deny how weak.. Just look at what happened to the "Ringworm Children" (google it) image if you can now what Palestinians have and do put up with..

4 ) Mel / USA
02/02/2013 09:13
Peter Splinter is Amnesty International’s representative to the United Nations in Geneva, as such he is fully conversant with historically blaming the Jewish people and Israel for the worlds woes, ever since the black plague.

5 ) Colin Wright / USA
04/02/2013 21:59
'Universal Periodic Review, human rights, and Israel.' Normally, when there is a contrast or a contradiction between the members of a series of terms, the desired conjunction is 'but,' or 'yet' -- not 'and.' Title should read: 'Universal Periodic Review, human rights -- yet Israel.'

6 ) Colin Wright / USA
04/02/2013 22:01
To Phil #2 ' Because the UN is home to many of the worst human rights abusers...' ...and as every good Zionist knows, two wrongs DO make a right. After all, if that weren't so, where would Israel be?

7 ) Wright crock of / crap
06/02/2013 13:43
#6. "After all, if that weren't so, where would Israel be?"

So high above your head you would need to climb a ladder just to kiss the brown eye.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Analysis: What does British vote to recognize State of Palestine mean?
Analysis: Free speech vs. freedom
Analysis: Diplomatic recognitions herald the road to peace

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014