اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

UK envoy attacked at West Bank university
Published Tuesday 05/03/2013 (updated) 07/03/2013 17:03
Click to enlarge or see more photos.
RAMALLAH (Ma'an) – Palestinian students at Birzeit University near Ramallah on Tuesday attacked the car of British Consul-General Sir Vincent Fean, smashing a mirror.

A Ma'an reporter saw a group of students gather in front of the administrative offices on campus where the consul general was at a meeting with university president Khalil al-Hindi.

When Fean left, students approached him chanting and screaming before his security guards surrounded him and prevented physical contact between the students and the consul general.

Some students were carrying rods, according to the reporter. As soon as he seated himself in the car, students attacked it with rods causing minor damage before the driver sped away.

The consul general was scheduled to take part in a symposium at the university, but the event was cancelled after the attack.

Student unions had expressed opposition to Vincent’s visit in protest of the UK's position toward the question of Palestine.


A representative for the British Consulate in Jerusalem confirmed the incident.

"The British Consul General, Sir Vincent Fean, visited Birzeit University today. His intention had been to engage in an open dialogue with the student community about the UK’s policies in the Middle East.

"Sir Vincent had hoped to underline Britain’s deep commitment to the creation of a Palestinian state, and the urgency of progress on the peace process in 2013.

"Sadly, such a dialogue was not possible on this occasion. Sir Vincent remains absolutely committed to building his relationship with the Palestinian student community, and hopes to have the opportunity to pursue this dialogue in future,” the British representative said.

In 2000, students at Birzeit attacked the French prime minister, at that time Lionel Jospen, and injured him in the head. Students were angry at remarks Jospen made in Tel Aviv describing the Lebanese Islamist party Hizbollah as a terrorist organization.

The Palestinian preventive security service detained 19 students for interrogation.
Print Send to friend
1 ) Zainab / UK
05/03/2013 15:15
Protests such as this take place all over the 'free' world all the time, and can relate to whatever issue is prevalant at the time. They are usually symptomatic of an underlying cause, in this case the UK position on Palestine (as perceived by the students). The UK envoy & the British Government understand this, & will attempt to engage in dialogue at a future date with the students, without ill will towards them. The UK saw riots last year & an inquiry was held as to the root cause of UK anger.

2 ) Fedup withlies / USA
05/03/2013 15:34
There has never been any sovereign state, west of the Jordan and east of the Mediterranean, in the last 3500 years except for Israel. There is no 'fakestine'.

3 ) Mike B / UK
05/03/2013 15:47
Zainab, are you saying that it is acceptable for Birzeit students to attack a diplomat during a visit just because they are 'angry'? If you think that Sir Vincent Fean and the FCO is going to forget about it you have got another thing coming. Your attempt to justify this appalling behaviour is outrageous especially as the Consul-General had only recently condemned Jewish settlements. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. By the way, the riots in the UK were carried out by thieving sociopaths

4 ) Nour / 1 State
05/03/2013 16:08
Well done boys. Freedom for the oppressed and colonized is exacted. Britain is the Head of the Snake ...

5 ) Zainab / UK
05/03/2013 16:08
@3: Mike - I don't believe I did shoot myself in the foot, I thought carefully about what I said & meant it. I also do not believe the 2011 UK riots were carried out by 'th...sociopaths'. As some of us are aware, UK society is not as fair & equal as people would portray it. The UK envoy & British Government are big enough to understand cause & effect, & we are talking about a group of student protesters here venting frustration at their situation, not the start of another war. We all want peace.

6 ) Jake / Canada
05/03/2013 17:00
"Sir Vincent had hoped to underline Britain’s deep commitment to the creation of a Palestinian state, and the urgency of progress on the peace process in 2013." What a joke. Does anyone believe that Britain is thus committed, with all the evidence to the contrary? I don't condone violence but I can understand the utter frustration that Palestinians must feel at the utter chasm between words and actions by states who pretend they want to help.

7 ) Mike B / UK
05/03/2013 17:05
I wonder if Zainab has any idea how many British Muslims had their shops looted and burned? How many Muslims were attacked by violent thugs if they tried to protect their property? Read the words of Mahbub Alam, 35 the proprietor of a computer shop; “The riots are disgusting, I would never have thought I would have witnessed something like this in a civilised society,” The Muslims of London and other cities had to defend themselves from thugs!

8 ) Christer / Sweden
05/03/2013 17:15
To #2 Fedup withlies / USA!
The UN General Assembly recognized Palestine last year, so now there are two states west of the Jordan. :-) What now is needed is a withdrawal of the illegal occupation! That is what the students wanted to tell the UK envoy, I think. And I support them!

9 ) Bemused / New Zealand
05/03/2013 17:45
Wouldn't YOU be a tad annoyed if some other country gave YOUR country to a bunch of deluded fanatics who spent the next 60 years trying to drive you out of your own homes? Britain had absolutely NO RIGHT to destroy the Palestinian state in the first place, and it's hypocrisy at its most abject to now speak about helping to create a 'new' one. The only genuine act would be for UK to support a one-state solution - the State of Palestine - and let any jew who wants live there under Palestinian law.

10 ) Carlos / usa
05/03/2013 18:09
Britain bears a special responsibility in the situation of Palestine. Britain lied to Palestinian leaders through Lawrence of Arabia and talked them into rebelling against the Turks for freedom. The problem was freedom was not the plan Britain had. Brutal oppression an colonization was the plan. Britain systematically destroyed the ability of Palestinians to protect themselves and gave the land to new colonizers, the zionists. Because of politics it could not treat zionist the same as Pals.

11 ) Carlos / usa
05/03/2013 18:13
Britain may have changed its colonial designs but continues to undercut the Palestinian quest for freedom by not condemning israeli inhumanity. Why cant Britain stand up to the US and say US and israeli policies are criminal?
If they did that then the Palestinians would have reason to forget past transgressions. Up until now Britain has paid lip service to peace and promoted murder of Palestinians.

12 ) mike / usa
05/03/2013 18:14
@5) yeah right u want peace ... tell me about it.

13 ) Gideon / South Africa
05/03/2013 19:08
@Christer #8. So imagine this scenario, Israel withdraws from all the West Bank...I do not understand why Israel can be a Jewish State with a Muslim minority and Palestine cant be a Muslim State with a Jewish minority...What happens if the terrorism continues? What would you suggest Israel do then?

14 ) Zainab / UK
05/03/2013 19:18
@Mike:3/7 - I am not sure why you are telling me about British Muslims, unless you are alluding to my comment about British society not being fair & equal, thus equating my comments with my name. I was actually speaking generally about the many inequalities that exist in the UK eg poverty, lack of social housing, lack of opportunity for the young, lack of education, as well as racism & religious phobia. Inequalities that exist in many parts of the world & which those at the bottom feel the most.

15 ) Giacomo / USA
05/03/2013 19:24
No, this does not take place in civilized countries against visiting emissaries seeking peaceful dialogue. If violent venting is desired, the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, Arab League, signators of the Khartoum Agreement, and PLO/Hamas would be much more reasonable targets. Their legacy exists today in the refusal to negotiate a peace agreement with Israel, and without them, everything on the negotiating table now would have already been settled peacefully. If peace is even desired.

16 ) Stupid cunning brit got what h / Israel
05/03/2013 19:28
e deserves! Lucky he did not get killed! Brits continue to appease sand-nazis! How stupid! LOL!

17 ) Carlos / Palestine
05/03/2013 20:42
UK gov't is zionazi owned. It's irrefutable and a given. They are traitors to their country men and WAR CRIMINALS to the rest of the world minus 22 countries. Erin Go Bragh!...Viva Palestina!..God Bless the Bolivarian and Hezbollah Revolutions!

18 ) gabi / australia
06/03/2013 01:03
# 2- what difference does that make? What is a "sovereign state" anyway. Maps showing the Achaemenian Empire in 6th and 5thc . BC. shows"Palestine". So does a map of the Persian Empire, 500 BC. Ditto Asia Minor under the Greeks and Romans , and Assyria empire map, 720 BC shows "Israel" as part of the Assyrian empire, "Kingdom of Judah" as owing tribute to Assyria, separate from "Israel" (sovereign states?) and all in an entity called "Palestine". So just read a bit more history, and learn.

19 ) Colin Wright / USA
06/03/2013 02:10
To Fedup #2: 'There has never been any sovereign state, west of the Jordan and east of the Mediterranean, in the last 3500 years except for Israel. There is no 'fakestine'.' First, there was an arguably independent, arguably Jewish state arguably incorporating the bulk of Palestine for about eighty years -- over two millennia ago. Historically, that's about it. Secondly, 'the Jews' who lived in it are still there. They're called 'Palestinians.' So yeah -- I'm fed up with the lies too.

20 ) Colin Wright / USA
06/03/2013 02:13
To Giacomo #15: 'No, this does not take place in civilized countries against visiting emissaries seeking peaceful dialogue. ' In short, the Palestinians should be polite, and grovel, and cringe, and ask nicely what the Israelis would be prepared to permit them. Name one people that won its freedom this way. The Palestinians need to make NOT giving them their freedom intolerable. Then they'll get it. Not before.

21 ) Colin Wright / USA
06/03/2013 02:19
To Fedup #2 (II). The worst thing about posts such as yours is that they make it obvious that you are buying into a 'history' concocted of ignorance and willful self-deception, and if you were willing to look at it at all critically, you would realize what a transparently self-indulgent, manifestly false fantasy it all is. But you aren't willing to do that. Far from what you claim, you are not 'fed up with lies.' You wallow in them.

22 ) Colin Wright / USA
06/03/2013 02:24
"Sir Vincent had hoped to underline Britain's deep commitment to the creation of a Palestinian state, and the urgency of progress on the peace process in 2013..." If so, then I don't see what the need for 'dialogue' with the Palestinians would be in the first place. The Palestinians will just stay -- they don't need to do anything in particular to bring this about. 'Dialogue' with the Zionists. They're the ones who are going to have to leave.

23 ) Reader / from Edmonton
06/03/2013 02:42
IF Britain supports Palestinian statehood, why done they stand in the UNGA and say so?

24 ) Israeli1 / Israel
06/03/2013 06:23
Someone from New Zealand is complaining about Britain taking away land? That is amusing.

25 ) Rami / Palestine
06/03/2013 09:06
#2 I didn't know that 1948 to 2013 = 3500 years. Thanks for the education.

26 ) Carlos / usa
06/03/2013 17:49
Palestine was completely independent hundreds of years before Christ. The land was Philistia. Jews, of mid east descent, & Palestinians are descended from them. Palestine has been an independent country off and on through the millenia to the present and it has also been occupied most of the time. Arabs have always been a large fraction of the population of Palestine/israel/judea. BTW in Christs time israel did not exist. Arabs majority til now. israel didnt exist as entity yrs bfre

27 ) Roberto / Venuzuela
07/03/2013 00:46
Why so many ignorant posts? Israel fought against Jordan NOT the Arab Palestinians, there was never a Palestinians state and will probably never will be one. Arab pals should claim their rights from Jordan who stole it from them. Israel recovered its lands from Jordan. Arabs are barking at the wrong tree. The brit were not there nor the "so-called palestinians" an invention from Arafat in 67.

28 ) Reader / from Edmonton
07/03/2013 18:38
Roberto has incorrectly stated that Israel recovered land from Jordan. Jordan, like Israel, occupied Palestine. But Jordan, unlike Israel, never claimed to own Palestine. That is what puts Israel on the wrong side of UN resolutions concerning their illegal transfer of Israeli citizens onto Palestinian territory.

29 ) USAUSA / USA
09/03/2013 10:12
#28: incorrect. Jordan annexed the West Bank and claimed to own it. They built housing there for the King, although no one called it illegal. Not all nations recognized the annexation, but most did. There was zero international condemnation or UN resolutions condemning but Jordan most certainly annexed the land and claimed to own it.

30 ) Reader / from Edmonton
12/03/2013 03:57
Jordan, at the insistence of the Arab League, held the West Bank and East Jerusalem as trustee pending a future Israeli/Palestinian agreement. Only Britain who promoted Jordanian annexation of the area formally recognized that Jordan indeed had. It had no legal basis.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Egyptian forces storm homes in north Sinai
Egypt reopens Rafah after kidnapped soldiers released
UN: Fighting displaces most Palestinians in Syria

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2013