اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Analysis: Salam Fayyad doomed by Israeli and Palestinian enemies alike
Published Thursday 18/04/2013 (updated) 17/05/2013 18:05
Font- Font+
Salam Fayyad addresses the annual Olive Harvest Festival in Bethlehem.
(AFP/Musa al-Shaer, File)

When Salam Fayyad took over the Ministry of Finance, the number one complaint against the Palestinian leadership was corruption.

I should know: In 1996 I was jailed for seven days because the small TV station I was running dared to broadcast live a session of the newly elected Palestinian Legislative Council dealing with corruption. Much has happened since then.

Now that he has been a minister and then prime minister, the former World Bank official has put Palestinian finances in order. He unified all income sources, dried up all slush accounts and went against Yasser Arafat's orders by insisting on paying all security officials by direct bank account, rather than with cash given to their commanders based on a questionable list of personnel.

Fayyad also became the first Arab government official to publish his government’s entire budget online, ushering a new transparency not seen in the entire Arab region.

As prime minister, Fayyad gave new meaning to the term "rule of law," developed the Palestinian police and security forces to impressive results, and upgraded the judiciary and its independence.

Palestine Radio and TV Corporation moved closer to a public service operation, although the president's office has continued to dictate the news segment. Independent media has also witnessed a golden period even though cases of security violations of press freedoms have persisted.

Fayyad began drawing up a detailed plan of what the Palestinian state should look like and directed his government and international funders in that direction. His blueprint of the state included human development and created the needed infrastructure for statehood, which included roads, ports and a West Bank airport.

Fayyad's efforts won him high marks on all levels, but it failed to provide him with the one element that was necessary: the acquiescence of the Israelis who directly controlled Area C, more than 60 percent of the West Bank.

The latest human rights report of the UK's foreign secretary, issued April 15, details some of the Israeli human rights violations that have no doubt weakened Fayyad.

Among them are: an "unprecedented surge" in Israeli settlement, referred to in the report as "illegal under international humanitarian law"; a barrier that incurs illegally on the Palestinian side of the Green Line; the restriction of people and goods to and from Gaza, including access to agricultural and fishing areas; 589 structures demolished in Area C in 2012, and 871 people displaced; violation of article 53 of the Geneva Convention; only 5 percent of building permits requested by Palestinians for Area C approved; and administrative detention used as punitive measure rather than for the narrow security purpose for which it was intended.

The Palestinian prime minister was also never able to convince Israel to respect the honor and legitimacy of the Palestinian government within Area A. Regular infiltrations continued unabated even after the professionally trained Palestinian security forces proved -- according to senior Israel Defense Forces officials -- their ability to deliver. Fayyad's legitimacy was eroded every time an Israeli army incursion occurred in Palestinian areas or every time settlement activities increased.

As the United States and other Western countries were unable to change Israeli behavior, the Palestinian leadership decided to seek help from the United Nations. This proved to be a fatal blow to Fayyadism, as Israel and the Americans turned against the Palestinians through financial means. The US Congress halted all aid; Israel held back taxes it had collected on behalf of the Palestinian Authority and tightened travel restrictions.

The ability of Salam Fayyad to overcome this economic hardship was further eroded by the failure of the two major Palestinian rivals to enact a Saudi- and Qatari-sponsored reconciliation agreement. Funding from those two wealthy Arab countries was held back until the agreement was completed, even though all evidence showed that the pro-Iranian Hamas was not interested in holding elections that could unseat them from power. Recent internal elections in Hamas and the distancing of the Islamists from Bashar Assad and Iranians may now make this possible, but it will be too late for Fayyad.

As the economic pinch hit home, Fayyad had no choice but to tighten the belt, This put him in direct conflict with such local powers as the pro-Fatah Public Workers Union, which refused to accept cuts or delays in its members' salaries and benefits. This situation was in turn a gift to Fatah cronies who have always despised Fayyad, a non-Fatah member, because he refused to do what previous prime ministers have done: spread the wealth to others in the party.

Fayyad's downfall was certainly abetted by internal forces unhappy with his professionalism, but there is no doubt that failure to deliver on political goals, refusal of Israel to respect his legitimacy and curtail its powers, and America's abandonment of him led to his departure.

Ironically, a last-ditch effort by Barack Obama and John Kerry to help boost the Palestinian prime minister was too little, too late. In fact, Kerry's public attempt on Fayyad's behalf was the last straw. Asked if he would withdraw his resignation after this public 11th-hour American plea, Fayyad said that no power on earth would make him withdraw it. Fayyad, a Palestinian patriot who has always tried to keep his finger on the pulse of the Palestinian people, understood that had he stayed in power, he would have confirmed his people's worst fears that he was simply a Western stooge.

Daoud Kuttab is a Palestinian journalist and former professor of journalism at Princeton University.
Print
1 ) Sam / US
19/04/2013 02:29
great analysis!

2 ) Tobias / USA
19/04/2013 02:47
Salam Fayyad had the right idea, of putting facts on the ground, but his Idea was "doomed," if the Palestinians refused to reach a peace/borders agreement with Israel, since neither Gaza, Nor the Oslo Accord Areas A/B are sufficient for a real viable state !!

3 ) Jane / Pa
19/04/2013 10:59
Dear Daoud Kuttab, you have to write a little bit about Al fatahs negative role. Their peopel cooperate with Israeli and agints Fayyad.

4 ) ........... / ...........
19/04/2013 18:36
fayyad sounds like a social democrat .

5 ) Tony B? / ME
19/04/2013 19:18
Blaming his failures on the Israelis is a classic symptom of the Palestinian disease. You're never willing to own responsibility for your own problems! You've had billions in aid. And even got the Israelis to collect taxes for you. But what did you do? Intifadas! And now you say it's their fault because their security measures interfere with your commerce. Well try a new tactic called peace and co-operation. Otherwise you will still be writing about the same failures ten years from now.

6 ) Jane / PA
20/04/2013 10:22
Tony, you are right 50 procent because Palestine is uder istrali occupation. They collect their taxes because of Oslo agremment. Originaly it would take only five year but not for ever. Come to West Bank and Gaza before you make conclusion. The other question is if Al Fatah leadres want a state of Palestine and lose the some kindof klan power they have over the poeple with help of Israel. Al Fatah leadershave VIP cards and good conections to Israel but journalist do not write about that.

7 ) Ben Alofs / UK/Netherlands
21/04/2013 13:41
Thanks, Daoud, for this excellent piece of analysis.

8 ) Giacomo / USA
22/04/2013 19:30
A good and honest man, Fayyad was never the legal PM of the PA according to the PLC; Haniyeh was, as Hamas won the last parliamentary elections. Fayyad was propped up in a no-win situation by Abbas, who tried but could not make him his stooge, just as Abbas is propped up and the stooge of the PLO, which is propped up and the stooge of the Arab League, its creator and ruler. You, Mr. Kutabb are responsible for your own Wakseh, and the more you deny it, the worse your situation becomes.

9 ) @ Giacomo-8 / USA too
23/04/2013 19:04
There's no room for honest, non-terrorists in Palestinian government !!
The Dishonest just see "a good and honest man", like FAYYAD, as being
in the way of the stealing, and not contributing to terror either, so
he HAD TO GO.

10 ) Outlier / USA
25/04/2013 18:07
I hope he emerges to lead the Palestinians - he appears to be a pragmatic person with the potential to be a true partner in peace with Israel.

11 ) Johnny benson / USA
26/04/2013 02:53
Shamefully......a honest man....maybe the only one......quits out of disgust.....there maybe is but 100 honest politicians in the whole Middle East.....come to think of it ....maybe in the whole world......he was a rarity....

12 ) hyena / Poland
05/05/2013 12:58
author almost managed to portray Fayyad as a competent figure but the sad reality is that palestinian IQ never goes above 80. palestinians must realize that peace will only be achieved when every one of them will be removed from Judea and Samaria and they can build their little terrorist country in the philistine. of course only until that last terrorist attack when they will be crushed and wiped off the face of the planet as should be done long ago

13 ) tamimi / gaza
08/05/2013 14:46
a gini out the bottle

14 ) yahya abudeek camp balata / netherlands
22/05/2013 10:28
Shame on the palestinian people too thing in there own intrest instead in a collectieve benfit off all,
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Analysis: Israeli restrictions on movement strangle Palestinian life
Analysis: What does British vote to recognize State of Palestine mean?
Analysis: Free speech vs. freedom

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014