اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

Abbas: US has presented no framework for Mideast peace
Published Thursday 13/03/2014 (updated) 15/03/2014 10:15
Font- Font+
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas meets with British Prime Minister
David Cameron in the West Bank on March 13, 2014
BETHLEHEM (AFP) -- Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas said Thursday that the US had yet to present a framework for a Middle East peace deal, as a deadline ending nine months of negotiations loomed.

"Until now, we haven't received the framework agreement we were promised," Abbas said at news conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron in the West Bank city of Bethlehem.

Israel and the Palestinians have been locked in talks that US Secretary of State John Kerry fought hard to kick-start in July after a three-year hiatus, but the negotiations have faltered over key issues.

The negotiations are set to end on April 29, by which date Kerry hopes to have put a framework agreement in place so the two sides can extend their negotiations to work towards a final peace deal.

"When the framework is presented to us, we'll give our opinion on it," Abbas said.

"We have never discussed prolonging the negotiations at all, nor was it offered to us."

Cameron said there were "serious disagreements" and "mistrust" preventing a peace deal, echoing concerns voiced by Kerry on Wednesday.

"As for the question of mistrust between Palestinian leadership and Israeli leadership... what I've seen over the last few days is serious disagreements on vital issues that will have to be settled if there ever is to be... a peace deal," Cameron said.

"There's no outcome that's possible where every Israeli is satisfied, where every Palestinian is satisfied. There has to be compromise. And compromise is difficult -- compromise takes bravery."

Cameron said Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom he met the day before, would "have to take difficult, unpalatable and sometimes unpopular decisions ... in order to achieve that peace."

Kerry acknowledged on Wednesday that the level of mistrust between Israelis and Palestinians was the highest he had ever seen.

He said there were "gaps ... some of them very significant", but stressed these should be seen within the context of the negotiations, saying: "I still believe it's possible, but difficult."

"Certain narrative issues are so powerful and so difficult that neither leader is going to definitively cede on them at an early stage of the negotiation," Kerry conceded.

After bringing the two sides back to the negotiating table, he has been focused on trying to hammer out a framework which is due to set out the goal of the talks plus guiding principles on each of the core issues.

Decades of negotiations have been bedeviled by some of the toughest disputes separating the two sides, such as the fate of Palestinian refugees kicked out of Israel when it was created in 1948 and the designation of Jerusalem claimed by both sides as a capital.

In recent months, Netanyahu has been insisting that Abbas recognize Israel as "a Jewish state" -- something the Palestinians refuse to do, believing that this would irrevocably torpedo chances for the return of refugees living in exile.
Print
1 ) ian / australia
15/03/2014 23:12
'Cameron said Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu...would "have to take difficult, unpalatable and sometimes unpopular decisions...in order to achieve...peace." ' Alright. What about recognising Israel as the Jewish State, renouncing the refugees' right to return to Israel proper, FULL withdrawal (of soldiers if not settlers) from the occupied territories and Israeli recognition of Palestine (as whatever the Palestinians want to call it) on the '67 borders. THEY would be

2 ) ian / australia
15/03/2014 23:13
(contd.) "difficult, unpalatable and unpopular decisions", guaranteed to NOT "satisfy" ALL Israelis or Palestinians. Also, fair, symmetrical and grounded in law; the pain shared equally; no-one bludgeoned into submission or stripped of their assets or rights or frog-marched into walled ghettos. (I agree with Saeb Erekat: this would take nine HOURS to work out, not nine months, if the "partner in peace" and the DESIRE for a just settlement were genuine. It took me nine minutes. You're welcome.)

3 ) Tobias / USA
18/03/2014 03:25
1- Palestine says that "Israel Must Choose Settlements or Peace", and 2- Israel's silence says that "Palestine Must Choose Compromise or continued Stateless-Occupation", since 3- Israel will prosper while "choosing settlements over peace", but Palestine will stagnate and fail choosing statelessness over compromise !!!
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Police: Palestinian confesses to car attack on soldiers
Palestinian woman run over by Israeli near Shufat
Palestinian youth beaten by Israelis near Jerusalem Old City

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014