اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

US in 'holding period' in Mideast peace talks
Published Saturday 26/04/2014 (updated) 27/04/2014 17:23
Font- Font+
Palestinian protesters wave the national flag as they face-off with
Israeli soldiers following demonstration against Israeli-occupied
West Bank settlements expansion, on April 25, 2014, near Ramallah
(AFP Abbas Momani)
WASHINGTON (AFP) -- Top US diplomat John Kerry does not see his efforts to broker Middle East peace as a failure, but his team is adopting a "holding period" as Israelis and Palestinians decide their next moves, a US official said Friday.

"This is a moment of transition," said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki. "We can't force the parties to take steps they're unwilling to take."

"We're in a holding period to see what the parties are willing to figure out about what's next."

Kerry's attempts to broker a peace deal by April 29 all but collapsed on Thursday when Israel pulled out of the negotiations, angered by the Palestinian move to form a unity government with the militant Hamas group.

But Psaki denied that Kerry felt he had failed in his efforts since taking office in February 2013 to seal a long-elusive peace treaty.

"He's always said that he believed it was worth it, not just for the United States to engage in this effort as a facilitator or to play any role possible in helping these parties come to the table, but worth it for the parties because the status quo is not sustainable," Psaki told reporters.

"Because the future where there is a two-state solution, where there is greater opportunity, where there is greater economic prosperity, is still in the interest of both people," she insisted.

"And we continue to believe that it's in America's interest as well as Israel's interest and the interests of the Palestinian people to see if we can resolve this conflict."

She revealed that President Mahmoud Abbas had insisted that any government formed with Hamas "will be his government and represent his policies, and that includes recognition of Israel, commitment to non-violence, adherence to prior agreements and commitment to peaceful negotiations toward a two-state solution."

Abbas's assurances were a "positive thing," Psaki said, but Washington would need to see what happens over the coming weeks.

Israel pulled out of the negotiations on Thursday, saying it would not sit down with an organization backed by Hamas.

Psaki would not be drawn on whether the US would seek to coax Israel back to the talks if Abbas follows through with his commitment that a new government would meet all the principles of peace.
Print
1 ) Mitri I. Musleh / Canada
26/04/2014 17:17
If the newly unified Palestinian government is willing to recognize Israel’s right to exist and renounce violence, it is equally significant that Israel recognizes the State of Palestine and renounces violence as well. This did not happen in 1993.

2 ) @ Mitri-1 / USA
27/04/2014 01:58
That is an unimaginably huge "IF", since 1- the PLO had 20 years to remove from the PLO Charter "Calls for Israel's Destruction, Armed Struggle," etc., but it has Not yet done so, and 2- Now with Hamas & Islam in the new "Unity" government, * THERE IS NO CHANCE PALESTINIANS WILL "RENOUNCE VIOLENCE", before the State of Israel is destroyed, so 3- Personally, I think we need to put the issues of prisoner release, construction, "recognition, and violence" aside, and just restart talks !!!
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

Minister: Unity government budget 'below zero'
Israel seizes PA tax revenues, official says
Hamdallah discusses Gaza reconstruction with UN rep

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2014